National Evaluation and Technical Assistance Center for the Education of Children and Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O
P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X Y Z
A
Allen, M. (2003). Eight Questions on Teacher Preparation: What Does the Research Say? Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
[Link to Summary]
B
Biancarosa, G., and Snow, C.E. (2004.) Reading next-A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York . Washington DC : Alliance for Excellent Education.
[Link to Summary]
Blomberg, T.G. & Waldo, G.P. (2002). Integrating research, policy, and practice in juvenile justice education. Evaluation Review, 26, 241-250.
[Link to Summary]
Blomberg, T.G. & Waldo, G.P. (2002). Evaluation research, policy, and politics. Evaluation Review, 26, 340-351.
[Link to Summary]
C
Chester , D.R., Tracy , J.A., Earp, E. & Chauhan, R. (2002). Correlates of quality educational programs. Evaluation Review, 26, 272-300.
[Link to Summary]
D
No Listing Available
E
No Listing Available
F
Foley, Regina M., & Gao, Jing. (2002). Correctional education programs serving incarcerated juveniles: A status report. Journal of Correctional Education. 53 (4), 131-138.
[Link to Summary]
G
Gagnon, J. C., & McLaughlin, M. (2004).Curriculum, assessment, and accountability in day treatment and residential schools. Exceptional Children, 70(3), 263–283. [Link to Summary]
Gonzales, R. & Mullins, T.G. (2004). "Addressing truancy in youth court programs." Selected topics on youth courts: A monograph . National Youth Court Center.
[Link to Summary]
H
Hellriegel, Kimberly L., & Yates, James R. (1999). Collaboration between correctional and public school systems serving juvenile offenders: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children. 22 (1), 51-83.sz
[Link to Summary]
Howell, Kenneth W., & Wolford, Bruce I. (2002). Corrections and juvenile justice, current education practice for youth with learning and other disabilities. Washington DC : Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice at the American Institutes for Research, and College Park, MD: The National Center for Education, Disabilities, and Juvenile Justice.
[Link to Summary]
I
Ingersoll, R. M. & Curran, B. K. (2004). Out-of-Field Teaching: The Great Obstacle to Meeting the “Highly Qualified” Teacher Challenge. Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association Center for Best Practices.
[Link to Summary]
J
JustChildren, Legal Aid Justice Center. (2004). A summary of best practice in school reentry for incarcerated youth returning home (PDF). Charlottesville, VA: Author.
[Link to Summary]
Juvenile Justice Evaluation Center. (2004) Approaches for Assessing Juvenile Justice Program Performance (PDF). Washington, DC: Justice Research & Statistics Association.
[Link to Summary]
Juvenile Justice Evaluation Center. (2002) Cost-Benefit Analysis for Juvenile Justice Programs (PDF). Washington, DC: Justice Research & Statistics Association.
[Link to Summary]
Juvenile Justice Evaluation Center. (2003) Evaluability Assessment: Examining the Readiness of a Program for Evaluation (PDF). Washington, DC: Justice Research & Statistics Association.
[Link to Summary]
Juvenile Justice Evaluation Center. (2001) Hiring and Working With an Evaluator (PDF). Washington, DC: Justice Research & Statistics Association.
[Link to Summary]
Juvenile Justice Evaluation Center. (2002) Incorporating Evaluation Into the Request for Proposal (RFP) Process (PDF). Washington, DC: Justice Research & Statistics Association.
[Link to Summary]
Juvenile Justice Evaluation Center. (2003) Juvenile Justice Program Evaluation: An Overview (PDF). (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Justice Research & Statistics Association.
[Link to Summary]
Juvenile Justice Evaluation Center. (2001) Strategies for Evaluating Small Juvenile Justice Programs (PDF). Washington, DC: Justice Research & Statistics Association.
[Link to Summary]
K
Killian, Eric, Brown, Randy, & Evans, William (2002). What Incarcerated Youth Say Would Help Them Succeed: Can Extension Play a Role? Journal of Extension.
[Link to Summary]
L
Larson, Katherine A., & Turner, K. David. (2002). Best practices for serving court-involved youth with learning, attention, and behavioral disabilities. Washington DC : Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice at the American Institutes for Research, and College Park, MD: The National Center for Education, Disabilities, and Juvenile Justice.
[Link to Summary]
Leone, P., Quinn, M.M., and Osher, D. July 2002. Collaboration in the Juvenile Justice System and Youth Serving Agencies: Improving Prevention, Providing More Efficient Services, and Reducing Recidivism for Youth with Disabilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
[Link to Summary]
M
Major, A.E., Chester , D.R., McEntire, R., Waldo, G.P. & Blomberg, T.G. (2002). Pre-, post-, and longitudinal evaluation of juvenile justice education. Evaluation Review, 26, 301-321.
[Link to Summary]
Mendel, Richard A. (2001). Less Cost, More Safety: Guiding Lights for Reform in Juvenile Justice. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.
[Link to Summary]
Morley, E., Rossman, S. B., Kopczynski, M., Buck, J., and Gouvis, C. November 2000. Comprehensive Responses to Youth At Risk: Interim Finding from the SafeFutures Initiative. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
[Link to Summary]
N
National Council on Crime and Delinquency. (2005). Implementation and outcome evaluation of the Intensive Aftercare Program. Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. [Link to Summary]
The National Council on Disability. 2003. Addressing the Needs of Youth with Disabilities in the
Juvenile Justice System: The Current Status of Evidence-Based Research. Washington,
DC: NCD.
[Link to Summary]
O
Osher, David, Dwyer, Kevin, & Jackson, Stephanie (2003). Safe, Supportive, and Successful Schools Step by Step. Longmont, Colorado: Sopris West.
[Link to Summary]
Osher, D., Rouse, J., Quinn, M., Kendziora, K. & Woodruff, D. With Firman, J. (2002).
Addressing Invisible Barriers: Improving Outcomes for Youth with Disabilities in the
Juvenile Justice System. Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice with National Center on Education, Disability, and Juvenile Justice.
[Link to Summary]
Osher, T. and Hunt, P. December 2002. Involving Families of Youth Who Are in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System. Delmar, NY: National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice.
[Link to Summary]
P
Parrish, Tom, Graczewski, Cheryl, Stewart-Teitelbaum, Abigail, & Van Dyke, Nina (2003). Policies, procedures and practices affecting the education of children residing in group homes. Washington DC: American Institutes for Research.
[Link to Summary]
Pesta, G., Respress, T., Major, A.K., Arazan, C. & Coxe, T. (2002). Evaluation research and quality assurance. Evaluation Review, 26, 251-271.
[Link to Summary]
Q
No Listing Available
R
Report to the U.S. Department of Education Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs (2004). Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators.
[Link to Summary]
S
Saizow, Hildy & Welch, Nancy (2003). Building Blocks community assessment: A blueprint for community change. The Insight Group.
[Link to Summary]
Saizow, Hildy, Welch, Nancy & Castorena, Celeste (2003). Choices on the Edge: Maryvale Community Assessment. Report prepared for the Arizona Supreme Court, Administrative Offices of the Court.
[Link to Summary]
T
Transition of juvenile offenders from placement to education services in the community (2004). TATC Consulting.
[Link to Summary]
U
No Listing Available
V
No Listing Available
W
Winokur, K.P., Li, S. & McEntire, R. (2002). Data integration in the evaluation of juvenile justice education. Evaluation Review, 26, 322-339.
[Link to Summary]
X, Y, Z
No Listing Available